‘Monsanto Protection Act’ Could End September 30th

September 25, 2013

26 Sept (POLITICO) – A controversial legislative rider added by Monsanto to the Agriculture  Department budget last spring will no longer be effective after Sept. 30 under a  draft stopgap government funding bill being drafted by Senate Democrats.

The provision touched off a storm last spring as critics accused Monsanto of  “court-stripping” to protect its sales of the genetically modified seeds for  which the St. Louis-based giant is a pioneer in commercializing.  The continuing resolution approved by the House last week would  extend the rider without comment for the first months of the new fiscal year.  But the Senate substitute, to be unveiled Wednesday, will explicitly go back and  make clear that that Monsanto-backed provision will end this month.

“That provision will be gone,” said Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ark.), confirming the  change to POLITICO. The Center for Food Safety, a Washington-based non-profit,  welcomed the decision as “a major victory for the food movement” and “sea change  in a political climate that all too often allows corporate earmarks to slide  through must-pass legislation.”

Short-term appropriations bills are not an excuse for Congress to  grandfather in bad policy,” said Colin O’Neil, director of government affairs  for the Center.

MonsantoThe whole dispute has been overshadowed by the larger fight over Republican  efforts to use the same CR to cut off funding needed by President Barack Obama  to implement his health care reforms. But for many environmental and food safety  groups, the so-called “Monsanto Protection Act” —as the rider was called—became  a major cause last spring, generating a huge amount of Internet traffic and  calls on Obama to veto the agriculture budget.

Caught in the middle was Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Barbara Mikulski  (D-Md.) who had inherited legislative agreements made under her predecessor, the  late Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii). Mikulski promised then that she would do  everything she could to terminate the provision with the new fiscal year. But  the CR posed its own challenges since typically the leadership simply extends  current spending and related provisions for the life of the resolution.

This is essentially what would happen under the House CR running through Dec.  15. Mikulski wants a shorter end date, Nov. 15. And given the Monsanto  controversy, she and Pryor, chairman of the agriculture appropriations  subcommittee, chose to act and take it out after Sept. 30.  Their decision was helped along by the fact that even early proponents in the  House Appropriations Committee appear to have backed away. Indeed the fiscal  2014 agriculture appropriations bill reported by the House panel but never voted  upon on the floor, did not extend the rider.

Monsanto and its allies have argued that what the company sought was no more  than what some federal courts have done themselves in the past: Allow farmers to  continue to use GMO seed –under environmental guidelines—while the court review  continues.  Monsanto successfully expanded support among farm groups also interested in  some such stewardship program. But the language itself was unusually strong in  that it directed Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack in no uncertain terms about  how he should respond in future court cases impacting GMO seeds.

The secretary “shall, notwithstanding any other provision of law… immediately  grant” temporary permits to continue using the seed at the request of a farmer  or producer wanting such a stewardship program, the provision reads. And while  Vilsack has been a big champion of the biotech industry, he was uncomfortable  with what he saw as an effort to “pre-empt judicial review.”

“We have all known this rider’s days were numbered,” O’Neil told POLITICO.  “But given the recent GMO contamination episodes of wheat and alfalfa in Oregon  and Washington it is clear that our nation’s safeguards, in particular those of  the federal courts, should not be under attack from policy riders like  this.”

For related article go to OMSJ Monsanto DuPont Pour Millions in GMO Fight.

Tags: ,

You must be logged in to comment

Log in